![]() ![]() This also leads to the hypothesis of a circular ordering of criminal actions, analogous to the color circle, a radex.The radex model, tested using multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) procedures, allows specific hypotheses to be developed about important constituents of criminal differentiation:Salience: MDS analyses reveal the importance of the frequency of criminal actions as the basis on which the significance of those actions can be established.Models of differentiation: The research reviewed mainly supports distinctions between criminals in terms of the forms of their transactions with their explicit or implicit victims.Consistency: Offenders have been shown to exhibit similar patterns of action on different occasions. However, current research indicates that the key distinctions are those that differentiate, within classes of crime, between offences and between offenders. The notion of a hierarchy of criminal differentiation is introduced to highlight the need to search for consistencies and variations at many levels of that hierarchy. For this process to move beyond deduction based on personal opinion and supposition to an evidence-based science, a number of aspects of criminal activity need to be examined, analyzed, and categorized. ![]() They are known not because of their ability to solve serial murders but because of their creation of a database, the Violent Criminal Apprehension Program (ViCAP), on which criminal justice professionals around the country and even the world have relied ever since.Offender character assessment is the derivation of inferences about a criminal from evidentiary and psychological aspects of the crimes he or she has committed. The radex can be applied to any criminal behavior.One of the most important investigative events of the last century was the creation of behavioral analysis units (BAUs) by the FBI. In addition, these quantitative and qualitative characteristics are viewed through the prism of development and change over time. Canter (2000) introduced the radex of criminality, the combination of quantitative and qualitative aspects of a crime. The following leaders may not be used for this assignment:Donald trump, Mike pence, Hillary Clinton, Tim Kane, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, nor James Comeyįorensic psychology addresses scientific questions about criminal actions, where the understanding of the actions leads to inferences about offender characteristics. the following questions regarding your chosen leaders:What were the leaders' bases of power? How was it gained? What was their reach or influence?How did the leaders find themselves in the position to serve as change agents? Describe the situation, including the need for a change agent.What mode did each leader operate in?Were the leaders successful change agents?What made the leaders successful or unsuccessful change agents?What were the similarities between the two successful leaders and the differences between the two successful and two unsuccessful leaders?Are there factors about the leaders you researched that might have predicted their success or failure before they achieved leadership roles? Explain at least three such factors.Use the attached Template. Write a brief biography of each of the leaders you selected. Study the factors involved in making leaders change agents.For the assignment, you will put well-known personalities and yourself under the microscope to learn what makes you and the individuals you select not only leaders but also what it takes for leaders to be change agents.Using the Online Library, the Internet, and periodicals such as Fortune, Business Week, and Forbes, research about the biographies, case studies, and articles of leaders.Choose any two leaders who you consider to have been very successful change agents and two who you believe have been unsuccessful change agents.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |